I use this space to work out ideas for papers and lectures, as well as the occasional oped. Comments--positive or negative--are more than welcome.
Sunday, July 17, 2022
Wednesday, July 13, 2022
Dobbs Unpopularity
Maybe what people are saying when rejecting Dobbs is not that they don't like the states deciding abortion, it is that they themselves don't want to be deciding abortion. Americans don't like to think about abortion. Now they have no choice. But though they find the choice unpleasant they will make sounder choices in their several democratically elected legislatures than 9 lawyers in their secret high tribunal ever could.
Monday, July 04, 2022
Good News for Trump, but Better New for DeSantis
Ann Althouse repots this poll, where she points out that although Trump has very high negatives, he is still the most popular figure in politics.
But what I think is more interesting is that DeSantis is the only political figure whose negatives are not higher than his positives. I don't see how more people don't comment on this.Sunday, July 03, 2022
Ezra Kline: Oh Captain, my Captain
On the Originalist Interpretation of the Constitution
On his podcast Ezra Kline quoted a legal scholar, who, in describing the originalists control of the Supreme Court, made the analogy to a ship that was built to a set of architectural plans. And then, when they took the ship on the ocean, they found they had to make changes and add things.They go along about 200 years making changes and adding things to the ship and then someone claims to have found the original plans. And they say that they have to get rid of everything that was added on to the ship and every thing has to be returned to the original plans no matter what. This can only result, argues the law professor, in a sinking ship.
It is a compelling analogy, but I think he gets it wrong. Our situation is that for 200 years changes have been made to the ship by a Captain who claims that he is only adding what was called for in the original plans. The the crew finds the original plans and it turns out that a lot of the things the Captain has been adding weren't in the original plans at all. Moreover, the original plans call for changes to be made not by the Captain's sole decision of what the original plans called for but by a vote of the crew.
The Captain is replaced by a new Captain who returns decision making to the crew. Future changes to the ship will be decided by the crew. Also, the changes that have been made to the ship can be kept or rejected by the vote of the crew. The crew, with more experience and closer contact with the problems faced by the ship and more minds on the problem will keep the ship afloat better than the expert diktats of the Captain.
Clarence Thomas' Conservatism has its Roots in Black Nationalism
This is a great article by Musa Al Garibhi, a liberal, on the thought of Clarence Thomas, who, Garibhi explains, started out as a black nationalist and ended up a conservative Republican. These are not opposites but, in Thomas' case, kindred ideologies. What connects them is a disdain for charity of the white man.
There is a lot to learn from black nationalism and the thought of Malcolm X. When I was in Chicago I lived around the corner from Louis Farakan's house. There were a lot of his followers in the neighborhood. They weren't especially friendly but you didn't see anyone dealing drugs on the street corners of Farrakhan's neighborhood.
I met one of his followers and I can't remember his name but we became pretty good friends. He was the drummer in a jazz band I was in. He was pretty good. Anyway, I found out he was a Muslim by accident. I was sitting in his car, I think I saw him sitting in his car as I was walking down the street in Winter and he invited me in to get warm. Anyway, his teenage daughter was sitting in the back seat and I extended my hand to shake hands with her and she said she doesn't do that. And her Father explained that she did not shake hands with men because of our religion. It was a pleasant chat and I wish I had stayed in touch with him.
I think of this when people say that we have to learn to love each other to get along in civil society. I don't suppose that loving each other would do any harm, but I don't think it is necessary or even advisable. The Nation of Islam is officially not in love with the US or white people, but I would rather have them as neighbors than the one I have now. (In fact, the Nation of Islam is officially hostile to Jews, which all the black people in Hyde Park assumed I was on account of I have curly hair and I am so smart.)
What is needed is mutual respect. One can dislike the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan and Malcolm X, but one must respect them. Not the put-on, pat on the head, I'm a nice person kind of respect but real respect. The kind of respect that is commanded by the other's accomplishments, pulling themselves up while disdaining the proffered help of white liberals. And the kind of respect that comes in a real measure from fear, which is the only sure and honest ground of respect.